A couple of days ago I had a small accident whilst riding my bike. I was riding behind a hatchback up to a right hand turn when they stopped suddenly. It's amazing the number of conscious thoughts that can go through one's head in a small amount of time, when there is an impending disaster. The things I can remember thinking are:
1. Shit they're stopping and I'm going way to fast! I'm rooted.
2. Brake.
3. Why is my right hand not on the brake. There it is. Go right hand brake! (I'd probably just been indicating with my right hand or something).
4. Damn. Too much left hand (front) brake. Here we go.
5. That back windscreen was rather bouncy.

This probably happened in about half a second. I wasn't frightened or worried about injury or anything like that - just working on stopping, which is handy as that's what I needed to do. Hooray for reactions.

It was pretty lucky the way things worked out. My cleats came out, so when the bike flipped I somehow landed on my feet. There was still a lot of forward momentum, but instead of faceplanting into bitumen I had a reasonably soft landing against the back of the hatchback.

The total damage from the incident was a crack in my front light. I rode away without so much as a bruise, but my legs were a little wobbly after all the excitement.

No I didn't walk down any red carpet, but I saw some others doing it last night at the opening to the Sydney Film Festival. It's yet another thing about people that I just don't understand. Someone walks down the red carpet and stops in the middle for a few photos. Onlookers stare at them and admire them (or something) and get all excited. Then they walk to the other end of the red carpet and get interviewed.

The interviewing bit I understand. Sometimes these people have interesting things to say about their art. I just don't get the red carpet and all the people watching. What about these people is worth going out of your way to look at from a distance? If they were aesthetically appealing enough to travel for then it would all be good, but they're not. They're just famous people.

The red carpet didn't bother me, as I could just walk past it to the bar. The half hour or so of speeches did a little. The traditional owners of the land were "recognised" too often to be interesting and the NSW minister for the arts proved herself to be either a bad public speaker or a dope. Three of the five speakers had something useful to say though.

Having said all that, it was a worthwhile event to go to. The film (Looking for Eric by Ken Loach) was entertaining. It's good to be watching a lightly humourous film in a crowd packed with beautiful people, all keen to laugh at any hint of a joke to demonstrate they understood it.

I'm struggling to not sound like a horrible cynic. In actuality I had a good time and really enjoyed the film. There are a bunch of other SFF films to look forward to over the next couple of weeks, and the opener has given me some confidence about them.

I got back into homebrewing about half a year ago. I've made six batches since I started in October:
- Coopers Lager
- Coopers Real Ale with strawberries
- Coopers Lager with honey
- Coopers Stout with chocolate and cocoa
- Coopers European Lager
- Brewcraft Premium Belgian Ale

To make the flavoured beers I just added strawberries, honey, or melted chocolate and cocoa to the mix before adding the water. The Strawberry Ale and Honey Lager were both winners with a nice subtle flavour coming through, but the Chocolate Stout just tastes like a slightly bitter stout.

The European Lager and Belgian Stout are both a little more expensive to make (the Belgian being about twice the price of normal beer) but are better tasting. I've only had a preview of the Belgian because it's not quite ready, but it's going to be great.

None of them have been failures, but so far friends have only gotten excited about the European Lager, and that's the big test. The strawberry and honey beers also got a seal of approval, but others were not so popular. Millerine is happy to drink them, so they can't be too bad.

The main change I've made since starting is moving from 740ml plastic bottles to 330ml glass bottles. The plastic is much easier at bottling time, and I still use them when I have them, but not as sustainable, and I was just drinking too much beer. The glass bottles are free from friends and parties, are a more manageable everyday drinking size, and just seem nicer.

Anyway, at less than $10 a carton for a good to great beer, I'm not about to stop making it.

We live in a society already obsessed with consumerism and well on it's way to obsession with the environment. This is pretty funny as it leads to ads which say "Buy a hybrid Honda Civic and help save the environment." It gets better when you realise that people believe it and buy a new hybrid, selling their two year old vehicle to someone else who will probably drive it. I've done a bit of maths, and it seems to me that if you buy a new car you have one more car being manufactured, and one more car either on the road or on the scrap heap. All of these things are bad for the environment. Also you save quite a lot more money not buying a vehicle than by buying one, no matter how little fuel it uses.

It's not just cars though. So many ways to save the environment and money are sold to us. I'm not a particularly smart person, but I'm pretty sure the best way to save money is to not spend it. Less stuff = more money. And if you want to reduce your carbon footprint and waste output, stop buying stuff. The more stuff you purchase, the more stuff has to be made, and the more stuff ends up as landfill or as a pollutant.

Saving money while reducing waste is easily demonstrated with food. The more processed food you buy the more expensive it will be per goodness (due to the effort in processing) and the more waste you will have (due to the packaging). If you eat fresh you will have less waste, less processing, and it will likely be cheaper. You'll almost certainly end up healthier as well.

Here are some helpful hints for saving money and the environment:
- Instead of getting a hybrid vehicle, stop driving.
- Don't bother replacing those incandescent light bulbs with flourescent. Turn the lights off instead.
- Instead of weighing up the healthiness of a boost juice over the cheap price of coke, eat some fruit. It's cheap, and it's the stuff juice is made of.

OK, so realistically we're not going to stop spending money altogether because we want to keep a standard of living, and trade is just such an efficient way of spreading the benefits of skills and resources. Just don't think that being a heavy consumer and beneficial to the environment are compatible.

For more fun, listen to Kate Soper on alternative hedonism and read this interview with Juliet Schor about the politics of consumption.

I seem to have come across quite a number of climate change extremists recently, from both sides of the fence. Those that think the environment is so important we should ignore the financial costs in fixing it and to not do so is stupid, and those who think climate change is a myth and we should ignore the environment for the betterment of the economy. To all these people I say BOLLOCKS! Even greenies need a few dollars for accommodation and food, and even ignoring climate change the environment still needs to be preserved. The worst case scenario with climate change is pretty bad as well, so it might be a good idea to keep tabs on that one. Please don't listen to stupid arguments like this one though.

For those poo pooing the environment and saying SHOW ME THE MONEY, think about water in Australia. Recently, in Sydney, a population of over five million people went to around 30% water reserves. Ignore that, and it won't be long until people start dying. Just one of many environmental issues we face.

A lot of the people who were saying we should ignore the effect on the economy to save the environment are now too worried about losing their job to argue anymore.

I heard an interview with Freeman Dyson, a physicist, futurist and general dude who was around in the Einstein days and is still active. He's a climate change skeptic, but has some very interesting things to say on the matter. He believes that the environmental movement is akin to a very useful and good religion where followers are keen on saving the environment, which is actually a good thing. The bad thing is that there is so much emphasis on climate change many other important environmental issues are not being given the attention they deserve.

Just a side note on the video I linked to earlier in this post, he has a better video as well, but still talks a bit of shit about not requiring evidence to make the best decision.